Financial overview Where do we stand on value, cost and return across the portfolio?
▦ Table view ↺ Reset Period: All ▾ Region: All ▾ iHub: All ▾ Project type: All ▾ Status: All ▾ Currency: GBP EUR USD synced across pages Actual against predicted value ◇ CRM
as at 2026-08-12 7.8% no target set · owner John Shipley, value not agreed Median absolute variance, closed projects 14 of 90 closed projects excluded — not calculable Cost against budget ◻ EPMS
as at 2026-08-12 107.0% no target set · no owner named £24m against £23m · declared base only 65 of 180 projects excluded — no budget set Value per hour ◈ CRM + EPMS
as at 2026-08-12 £938/h no target set · no owner named 25,962 hours · value from CRM, hours from EPMS 104 of 180 projects excluded — not calculable Utilisation ◻ EPMS
as at 2026-08-12 75.8% no target set · owner John Shipley, value not agreed 100,421 booked of 132,480 available hours Hub split: Sheffield 35% · Düsseldorf 32% · Detroit 33% of booked hours Savings delivered against committed ◻ EPMS
as at 2026-08-12 91.7% no target set · owner Paul, value not agreed £5.5m evidenced against £6.0m committed 8 of 60 commitments excluded — no evidence recorded Projects closed without a value ◇ CRM
as at 2026-08-12 15.6% no target set · owner Paul, value not agreed 14 of 90 closed projects · no CRM value These projects are excluded from every value measure on this page Actual value and cost by month — both series in £ on one shared axis, no dual axis ◈ CRM + EPMS ▦ Table £27k £968k £1.9m £2.9m £3.8m Value Cost 08/24 11/24 02/25 05/25 08/25 11/25 02/26 05/26 Value by iHub ◇ CRM ▦ Table Sheffield £10m Detroit £8.2m Düsseldorf £5.9m
104 of 180 projects excluded — no value recorded Attention strip — financial exceptions needing a decision ◈ CRM + EPMS ▦ Table Exception Project iHub Magnitude Decision needed ▲ Over budgetTessera grinding study Sheffield 32% over · £409,266 over budget Restate budget or accept overrun Drill ▸ ▼ Value shortfallSummit grinding study Detroit 56% short of predicted · closed 2026-07-26 Review the offer-gate estimate Drill ▸ ◆ Savings unevidencedKestrel grinding study Düsseldorf 197,085 committed · no evidence recorded Evidence or withdraw the commitment Drill ▸ ■ Stage payment overdueMarlow grinding study Detroit Offer accepted · due 666 days ago · not raised Raise the stage payment or reschedule Drill ▸ ■ Stage payment overdueKestrel cell Detroit Offer accepted · due 644 days ago · not raised Raise the stage payment or reschedule Drill ▸ ■ Stage payment overduePinnacle grinding study Düsseldorf Offer accepted · due 633 days ago · not raised Raise the stage payment or reschedule Drill ▸ ■ Stage payment overdueUnion cell Sheffield Offer accepted · due 627 days ago · not raised Raise the stage payment or reschedule Drill ▸ ■ Stage payment overdueOstend insert programme Detroit Offer accepted · due 603 days ago · not raised Raise the stage payment or reschedule Drill ▸
174 exceptions, eight shown · sorted by magnitude, ranked within exception type · every row drills through · stage payments carry status only, never an amount This connects Excel live to the model rather than downloading a snapshot. A PivotTable built this way refreshes against the same figures as this page — the numbers stay current instead of ageing in a saved workbook — and the measures and folders in the field list are the ones used here: Value, Cost, Effort, Schedule and Counts, in business language, with the currency and decimal places already set. A measure with nothing to report comes through blank, not zero.
As at 2026-08-12 · EPMS refreshed 2026-08-12 05:40 UTC · CRM refreshed 2026-08-12 04:05 UTC · GBP, period-average rates
Cost basis: project engineering time only. Excludes senior management time, business development time, travel. ◆ Not yet agreed.