Tooltip pages
Five report pages sized 320x240. Each answers exactly one follow-up question and stops; anything needing a second question is a drillthrough. As-at stamp on every one.
T1 · Parity scatter point
tool trial · PRJ-0001
- Predicted at offer gate
- Withheld
- Actual at closure
- Withheld
- Variance
- Withheld
- Variance %
- Withheld
- Hours
- Withheld
- Closed
- 2026-06-08
- iHub
- Sheffield
As at 2026-08-12 · one follow-up, answered
T2 · Waterfall category
Labour — top five contributors
- Ostend grinding study
- £1,522,476
- Helios cell
- £1,331,688
- Tessera grinding study
- £1,121,034
- Summit insert programme
- £1,095,468
- Ostend tool trial
- £941,386
Cost basis v0.2 — recorded project cost across three inputs: Product (never shared), Resource (no rates exist) and Purchased (exists). ◆ Proposed · Awaiting decision · owner Roberto Manel, Financial controller, SLT
As at 2026-08-12 · one follow-up, answered
T3 · Hours matrix cell
Frank Roth on Kestrel cell
- Total hours
- 136 h
- Months with a booking
- 5 of 12
As at 2026-08-12 · one follow-up, answered
T4 · Utilisation band
Düsseldorf — utilisation, eight quarters
- Latest quarter
- 61.4%
- Basis
- Booked hours ÷ available hours
As at 2026-08-12 · one follow-up, answered
T5 · Page 7 calculated figures
Page 7 — calculated figures
Conversion rate (7.4)
Share of requests at one step that reached the next.
Requests at the later step ÷ requests at the earlier step.
Change against previous period (7.4, 7.11)
This period's count minus the count twelve months earlier.
Needs a stored snapshot of the pipeline; none exists today.
Pipeline value by year (7.10)
Estimated value of requests in the pipeline, placed in the year it is expected.
An estimate made on the request, not a quote and not an invoice.
Average value per request (7.7, 7.8)
Pipeline value ÷ number of requests that carry an estimate.
Requests with no estimate are left out of both.
As at 2026-08-12 · one follow-up, answered